WORKING GLOSSARY OF
SEMANTICS TERMINOLOGY AND CONCEPTS (Last update 17
May 2002) (Drawn and adapted from various sources. Part of the Psybertron K-Blog) (See Glossary page for “One-Look” link, usually finding
the Merriam-Webster entry most comprehensive and clear.) |
||
TERM / NAME
|
WORKING
DEFINITION |
NOTES |
AdageMetaphorical Aphorism |
A
statement or saying, often, but not exclusively, an aphorism, often partly metaphorical. |
See
Aphorism |
AffectiveKnowing what you believe. |
Concerning
knowledge perceived from subjective feelings. |
I
know this is true, even though I probably couldn’t prove it to you. |
AphorismWe hold this truth to be … |
A
concise or terse statement of, or embodying, a general principle or truth. |
See
Adage |
CognitiveKnowing what you see |
Concerning
knowledge perceived from acquaintance with observable empirical facts. |
I
can see it from here and I can see that it is red. |
CyberneticsPurposeful automation |
Discipline
concerned with information, feedback, identity and purpose. |
Cybernetics
as defined in the 1940s independent of whether the system in question was an
animal or machine, individual or population |
DeductivePresuming Universal Truth. |
Logical
reasoning proceeding primarily from previously known facts. Essentially
subjective, since “previous knowledge” depends on the knower and their
context. |
Fine
for checking the logical consistency of any sets of facts, (consolidating
existing knowledge) but exposed to the risks that none of these “facts” is
necessarily true in any absolute sense (so no new knowledge emerges).
Deductive reasoning is a process essential to knowledge, provided it is
remembered that the process is testing the “presumption” of previous
knowledge. |
DialecticsLogical Argument |
The
method of arriving at a thesis or constructing a proof, or simply conducting
and argument, by use of analysis and synthesis of a series of classical
logical syllogisms, particularly (after Hegel) involving the inclusion of
contradictory antithesis in the argument. |
Eg
We hold A to be true. If B and C imply A cannot be true, then either B or C
is false or our original premise must be false. |
EpistemologyThe Science of Knowledge |
How
do we know something? Philosophy that concerns the forms, nature, and
preconditions of knowledge. |
|
EthnographyGroup Communication Behaviour |
Analysing
the information and knowledge in a particular domain by observing the
behaviours of the whole group of stakeholders interacting in that domain. |
(Literally
social anthropology) |
EtymologyWord Derivation |
The
origin and derivation of words or phrases and components thereof from previous
linguistic forms and associated semantics. |
|
ExegesisExplaining Information
|
The
interpretation or explanation of information (typically a biblical text)
beyond what is explicitly represented. (From the Greek to explain.) |
|
HermeneuticsInterpreting Information |
The
science and methodology of interpretation or exegesis (originally, of
biblical texts). (From the Greek to
interpret) |
|
InductiveScientific Discovery |
Objective
reasoning proceeding by methodical analysis of observed outcomes and
potentially causal conditions, without motivation to base the rationale on
pre-conceived facts. Logical inference of the general from the particular. |
Difference
from deductive reasoning is that induction intends to create new knowledge
and challenge the old, by “discovery”. After Bacon. |
InterpretivismRecognising Context |
A
methodology based on understanding the context of information, and the
processes whereby information influences, and is influenced by, its context. |
(See
Walsham / Myers et al, and later Wittgenstein – “Philosophical
Investigations”) |
MereologyComposition |
The study of whole-part relationships. |
|
MetaphysicsFundamentals of Existence |
The branch of philosophy concerned with
the first principles of fundamental existence in natural science and thought. |
|
Noumenon (ology)Existence without Attributes
|
A thing
in itself, an object reasoned as having existence in the complete absence of
any perceivable attributes. |
(Opposite of phenomenon) |
ObjectivismIndependent Reality |
Studies
based on the idea that what things actually are, is independent of any
observation or context. |
(Distinct
from Noumenology, which presumes the absence of anything to observe.) |
OntologyWhat may be known about what may exist. |
An
Ontology is a description according to an inventory and a Taxonomy of
entities that are deemed to exist. |
(As
opposed to a Metaphysical theory, which might attempt to explain or reason
the fundamental existence and nature of those entities.) |
Phenomenon (ology)Appearance is Everything |
Studies
based solely on observation of the appearance of phenomena, independent of
any underlying reality. |
As
opposed to Noumenon. (WYSIWYG
– If it quacks like a duck, etc …) |
PhilologyLiterary Knowledge |
Study
of published literature in terms of linguistic knowledge and cultural history |
|
PositivismLogical Reasoning is everything |
Studies
based on the idea that complex information is synthesised only from existing
simpler facts by deductive reasoning. Observations may be analysed to test
such information, but are not themselves true knowledge. |
(See
early Wittgenstein – “Tractatus – Logico-Philosophicus”.) |
ReificationCasting Abstraction in Concrete. |
Considering analytic or abstract relationship as though it
were a concrete entity. |
From Principia Cybernetica (Young, p. l09) The process of regarding
something abstract as a material entity, Whitehead's "fallacy of
misplaced concreteness," e.g., the mistake of confusing a system, which is a construct, with the
physical entity described in its terms (see general systems theory).
In social systems
reification is encouraged by the use of language and underlies
many processes of constructing social reality. (Krippendorff) |
RelativismMultiple Viewpoints |
Studies
based on the idea that multiple (subjective) viewpoints can be valid
simultaneously, and that there is no absolute god’s-eye-view. |
(However,
not all viewpoints can be equally valid in all contexts, otherwise this is a
destructively recursive line of thinking.) |
RhetoricGift of the Gab |
Use
of language (and the associated linguistic techniques of style and content),
which is effective in persuading its recipients to understand, believe or act
on the intended message, independent of whether the message contains or
references any formal argument (dialectical logic or otherwise) to support
it. |
Often
used pejoratively (empty rhetoric) to imply the absence of any such argument,
despite historical roots of the term as a learned branch of philosophy or
linguistics. Much vilified by the logical positivists since Aristotle / Plato
et al. Implicit in the effectiveness of rhetoric is that the message in some
way appeals to, or connects with, common sense or received wisdom already
intrinsic in the receiver (observer). “I can believe that” or “That makes
sense to me” without, or more likely before, any rationalisation of why. |
SemanticsRules about Meaning |
The
rules about, or relationships between, what is actually meant (represented or
signified) by some representation, and the representation itself, encoded or
symbolic. |
|
SemasiologyThe Science of Semantics |
The
form and nature of meaning, and what makes things meaningful or significant. |
|
SemioticsDiagnosis by Inference |
The
study of what can be inferred from what is observed (originally medical). The
study of how information, sensed as an apparent effect of a real world phenomenon
(in context), relates to its objective (real) characteristics. |
|
SyllogismLogical Deduction |
Deductive
logical reasoning, normally from the general to the specific, involving two
premises (one major and one minor) leading to a third conclusion. (See
Dialectic) |
Humans
have two legs, I am a human, and therefore I have two legs. |
SyntaxLanguage Rules of Expression |
The
rules for valid structure (grammar) and symbols (words) used to express information
in a given language or encoding implementation. |
|
TaxonomyClassification Structure |
That
part of an Ontology concerned with structure according to the principles of
classification of entities. |
|