Category: Uncategorized

The Pepys Project may prove interesting ?

Blogger creates RSS OK, with basic title / description / link tags only, but has no subscription / syndication service (yet). I’m just gathering some useful links to other RSS resources here.
VoidStar’s RSSify does no more than Blogger, but at least you can apply it to existing archive pages.
Phil Ringnalda
Morten Frederiksen
Syndic8
Meerkat at O’Reilly

And whilst I’m on the subject what about linking / backtracking
TrackBack Seems to have died a death ?

Alternative Logics. Thanks to Seb for this Kuro5hin link. A good summary with some links to more detailed sources. Includes multivalued / fuzzy logics and qauntum logic amongst several others new to me. It is fundamental to my thesis that knowledge models must recognise that classical logical rationale is much too limiting – it forces rationalisations even where these destroy the facts – it “conspires to misinform” or “reification kills knowledge” I may have mentioned before.

Identity Crisis ? Dave Weinberger at JOHO says ID’s are nice but not the centre of the universe. Well I beg to differ. On aspect of our “semantic web” is that the nodes become less significant than the links, in fact the nodes simply become “pointers” for the links to link to – just look at URI’s / RDF / RSS. Without identity (identifiers) the nodes disappear entirely.

Psybertron Goes RSS. RSS Feed available from today at www.psybertron.org/rss.xml
[And no surprise I need to validate my XML – escape my Ampersands etc.]

Internet Management Becomes Less Democratic. Should we be concerned about changes at ICANN ? [via Beeb]

Web is a Waste of Time. Depends on your definition of “waste”. [via Beeb] Not part of bookable / accountable effort, but without value ? I think not necessarily.

In The Navy ! Another case of “Many a true word …” ? [via Beeb]

Artistic License ?. BBC Radio 4’s Today Programme this morning had an interview with the chairman of judges of the Turner Prize. The recent selection caused a stir when the UK Gov’t minister Kim Howell suggested it was 100% conceptual bullsh*t with pathetic rationalisations to justify it. Interestingly when Humphries was interviewing the chairman, he was getting at “but on what criteria” are the works selected. It was clear from the body language in the responses (oxymoron on the radio ?) that there were unspoken agendas that could not be expressed. A kind of “please don’t make me rationalise the irrational – it’ll spoil the art”. Reification kills art too then ?

String Theory of Semiology ! Ostensibly a hoax originating in France (via Jorn), full of gobbledygook pseudo-science linking quantum gravity and string theory with information models. The motive was probably originally to ridicule quantum information theories, but it succeeded in “fooling” learned publishing referees and escaped into the world as a serious scientific paper. However – could this be another case of “Many a true word …” ? (How many serious, respected theoreticians have produced suspect mathematics to justify their intuitions ? – Remember Einstein’s gaff, and see the Heisenberg link below.)